#102878: "No color won, the game should have been a complete draw, but it still went to normal tie breakers"
Пра што гэтая справаздача?
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Калі ласка, праверце, ці існуе ўжо справаздача на тую ж тэму
Калі гэта так, ПРАГАЛАСУЙЦЕ за гэтую справаздачу. Справаздачы з найбольшай колькасцю галасоў будуць разглядацца У ПЕРШУЮ ЧАРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Дэталёвае апісанне
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася
End game.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?
End game.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?
End game.
-
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
End game.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
Гісторыя справаздачы
boardgamegeek.com/thread/3002700/question-no-one-wins-and-losing-faction
And here is where she says all these rule clarifications are correct
boardgamegeek.com/filepage/252122/turncoats-rules-end-game-clarifications
Which includes this clarification:
2. WINNING FACTION
The Faction that rules the most areas wins.
If tied, the tied faction with the most stone on the axe wins.
If still tied, the still tied faction with the most stone on the flag wins.
If still tied, there is no winning faction and there is no winning player.
This game ended the same way, it shouldn't be that easy to force a win, just end the game on a color tie with less stones?
boardgamegeek.com/thread/3161778/all-factions-lose-no-player-wins-or-least-stones-w/page/1
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Дадайце да гэтага дакладу
- Іншая Табліца ID / ID ходу
- Ці F5 вырашыла Вашу праблему?
- Ці з'яўлялася праблема некалькі разоў? Кожны раз? Выпадкова?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
