• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).

Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).

However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.

• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).

However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).

However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)

Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).

However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA

Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).

However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.

• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?

Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).

However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.

• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?

Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).

However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).

However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).

However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).

However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?