#110545: "Show the setup card and give more setup information in the game options"
Пра што гэтая справаздача?
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Калі ласка, праверце, ці існуе ўжо справаздача на тую ж тэму
Калі гэта так, ПРАГАЛАСУЙЦЕ за гэтую справаздачу. Справаздачы з найбольшай колькасцю галасоў будуць разглядацца У ПЕРШУЮ ЧАРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Дэталёвае апісанне
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
-
• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
-
• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
-
• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?
-
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v120
-
• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
-
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v120
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.
Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...
The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.
So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.
Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.
This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.
This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v120
Гісторыя справаздачы
I agree that player's should need to open the rulebook just to see what the setup consists of, but I don't want to go so far as to start making lists of items underneath the pulldown.
This information is well-suited for the How to Play section, which is a user-editable wiki. That section is also linked to prominently from BGA's new game start page. Meanwhile, if you have succinct changes for the pull-down descriptions, I'm happy to make those too, but it's going to need to be a summary in a few words rather than a list. Just follow up here with rewording suggestions and I'll reopen.
Note that I don't mean the text in the pull-down menus (those have to stand on 1 line) but the text just below once the options has been selected.
For the French version of the wiki that is.
Дадайце да гэтага дакладу
- Іншая Табліца ID / ID ходу
- Ці F5 вырашыла Вашу праблему?
- Ці з'яўлялася праблема некалькі разоў? Кожны раз? Выпадкова?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
