#13021: "Elo 400: create a threshold between strong players and expert players"
Пра што гэтая справаздача?
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Калі ласка, праверце, ці існуе ўжо справаздача на тую ж тэму
Калі гэта так, ПРАГАЛАСУЙЦЕ за гэтую справаздачу. Справаздачы з найбольшай колькасцю галасоў будуць разглядацца У ПЕРШУЮ ЧАРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Дэталёвае апісанне
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).
The strong player range (Elo 300 - 500) is broad for games like RFTG.
Suggestion is to divide this in two classes 300 - 400 and 400 - 500.
A player with Elo 150 (average player) vs a Elo 250 (good player) has the same chances to win (theorically) as a Elo 350 (strong player) vs Elo 450 (also strong player...). -
• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
The strong player range (Elo 300 - 500) is broad for games like RFTG.
Suggestion is to divide this in two classes 300 - 400 and 400 - 500.
A player with Elo 150 (average player) vs a Elo 250 (good player) has the same chances to win (theorically) as a Elo 350 (strong player) vs Elo 450 (also strong player...). • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
The strong player range (Elo 300 - 500) is broad for games like RFTG.
Suggestion is to divide this in two classes 300 - 400 and 400 - 500.
A player with Elo 150 (average player) vs a Elo 250 (good player) has the same chances to win (theorically) as a Elo 350 (strong player) vs Elo 450 (also strong player...). • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)
The strong player range (Elo 300 - 500) is broad for games like RFTG.
Suggestion is to divide this in two classes 300 - 400 and 400 - 500.
A player with Elo 150 (average player) vs a Elo 250 (good player) has the same chances to win (theorically) as a Elo 350 (strong player) vs Elo 450 (also strong player...). • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA
The strong player range (Elo 300 - 500) is broad for games like RFTG.
Suggestion is to divide this in two classes 300 - 400 and 400 - 500.
A player with Elo 150 (average player) vs a Elo 250 (good player) has the same chances to win (theorically) as a Elo 350 (strong player) vs Elo 450 (also strong player...). -
• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?
The strong player range (Elo 300 - 500) is broad for games like RFTG.
Suggestion is to divide this in two classes 300 - 400 and 400 - 500.
A player with Elo 150 (average player) vs a Elo 250 (good player) has the same chances to win (theorically) as a Elo 350 (strong player) vs Elo 450 (also strong player...). -
• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?
-
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?
The strong player range (Elo 300 - 500) is broad for games like RFTG.
Suggestion is to divide this in two classes 300 - 400 and 400 - 500.
A player with Elo 150 (average player) vs a Elo 250 (good player) has the same chances to win (theorically) as a Elo 350 (strong player) vs Elo 450 (also strong player...). -
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
The strong player range (Elo 300 - 500) is broad for games like RFTG.
Suggestion is to divide this in two classes 300 - 400 and 400 - 500.
A player with Elo 150 (average player) vs a Elo 250 (good player) has the same chances to win (theorically) as a Elo 350 (strong player) vs Elo 450 (also strong player...). • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
The strong player range (Elo 300 - 500) is broad for games like RFTG.
Suggestion is to divide this in two classes 300 - 400 and 400 - 500.
A player with Elo 150 (average player) vs a Elo 250 (good player) has the same chances to win (theorically) as a Elo 350 (strong player) vs Elo 450 (also strong player...). • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
The strong player range (Elo 300 - 500) is broad for games like RFTG.
Suggestion is to divide this in two classes 300 - 400 and 400 - 500.
A player with Elo 150 (average player) vs a Elo 250 (good player) has the same chances to win (theorically) as a Elo 350 (strong player) vs Elo 450 (also strong player...). • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
Гісторыя справаздачы
Feel free to debate!
One added suggestion is that once you reach a level in a game, you keep your highest label even if your elo drops back down. So if you reached master, you would always be identified as a master from that point on. The new player bonus would need to be turned down since most players reach their highest rank in their first 20 games because of the crazy bonuses.
This suggestion is 2.5 years old, has the 7th-highest number of votes (303) and yet has no acknowledgement from the BGA team. It would be great if this could get some attention.
300 & 400 players are TOTALLY different level
Seasons is a good example. Seasons ELO alogrithm needs to be recalibrated.
I might have a very close or higher ELO than a player that has played 7-10 times more games than I, in a game where experience really matters and the player is actually much better than I. It happens all the time and it makes it very hard for me to end up in games with people who are playing close to my level. I lose virtually all the games and yet my ELO stays the same and I continue to end up paired with people who've played 1000 games to my 100.
If you really lose virtually all the games, your Elo would go down (not below 100). The fact that your Elo stays roughly the same indicates that your Elo is on the correct level.
I suspect there may also be an issue of real-time versus turn-based games. For example, I'm very much a turn-based player. I play much worse under time pressure, so my relatively high Elo might not mean much in a real-time game.
Along with this idea, 600elo and 700elo also need to be broadly distinguished. If you organize all the colors differently for every 100 units of elo, the motivation for elo climbing will be strong.
0: Iron
100: Bronze
200: Silver
300: Gold
400: Platinum
500: Diamond
600: Master
700: Grandmaster
This seems to be standard MO for BGA for documented bugs and reasonable suggestion such as this one.
...meanwhile BGA admin continue to implement things that literally no one asked for, like a gaudy new game-listing page and more restrictive table options. :-O :-(
As said before allow restricting tables to any minimum/maximum ELO, by typing it in is a must.
It is flexible so it can adapt to any game / elo range and needs. Would be so nice !
Most games on BGA have randomness build in so the difference in skill between 300 Elo and 500 Elo is massive with that in mind. This is often the difference of winning 50% of your games versus >80% of your games via matchmaking.
500+ rating option is often too limited in players and 300+ rating is too wide.
Дадайце да гэтага дакладу
- Іншая Табліца ID / ID ходу
- Ці F5 вырашыла Вашу праблему?
- Ці з'яўлялася праблема некалькі разоў? Кожны раз? Выпадкова?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
