• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася

Noted above inline.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

Noted above inline.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?

Noted above inline.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?

Noted above inline.

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

Noted above inline.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

Noted above inline.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?