• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

It's not possible to attack without using the extra steps

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?