• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?