#158208: "2nd and 3rd place etc. scoring aren't reflective of who was 2nd best"
Пра што гэтая справаздача?
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Калі ласка, праверце, ці існуе ўжо справаздача на тую ж тэму
Калі гэта так, ПРАГАЛАСУЙЦЕ за гэтую справаздачу. Справаздачы з найбольшай колькасцю галасоў будуць разглядацца У ПЕРШУЮ ЧАРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Дэталёвае апісанне
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?
-
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. -
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.
The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.
The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
Гісторыя справаздачы
A more complicated and probably divisive solution would be to add some additional points at the end to rank 2nd-3rd-4th by total goods + money or something, but that seems complicated and might be impossible to do well? But it's another idea.
Дадайце да гэтага дакладу
- Іншая Табліца ID / ID ходу
- Ці F5 вырашыла Вашу праблему?
- Ці з'яўлялася праблема некалькі разоў? Кожны раз? Выпадкова?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
