#168474: "Automatically skip Fulfill action if the player cannot fulfill any Visitor's order"
Пра што гэтая справаздача?
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Калі ласка, праверце, ці існуе ўжо справаздача на тую ж тэму
Калі гэта так, ПРАГАЛАСУЙЦЕ за гэтую справаздачу. Справаздачы з найбольшай колькасцю галасоў будуць разглядацца У ПЕРШУЮ ЧАРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Дэталёвае апісанне
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).
Right now, when a player reaches the Fulfill action, if they cannot fulfill any Visitor's order (because they do not have the matching potions for any available Visitor), the game waits until the player clicks "Ignore" before moving on to the next player/round.
It would be really handy if the game could detect this situation (by comparing the player's potions vs. the available visitors) and automatically move past the Fulfill action in this case. It's a small thing, but (especially in turn-based games) it would save everyone from having to wait until a player logs in just to click "Ignore."
(I think that it's possible to determine this, because there aren't any mechanics that allow the player to trade one potion for a different potion before Fulfilling, etc. Hopefully I'm not overlooking anything obvious.)
Thanks for your hard work on this great implementation, and for considering this request! -
• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
Right now, when a player reaches the Fulfill action, if they cannot fulfill any Visitor's order (because they do not have the matching potions for any available Visitor), the game waits until the player clicks "Ignore" before moving on to the next player/round.
It would be really handy if the game could detect this situation (by comparing the player's potions vs. the available visitors) and automatically move past the Fulfill action in this case. It's a small thing, but (especially in turn-based games) it would save everyone from having to wait until a player logs in just to click "Ignore."
(I think that it's possible to determine this, because there aren't any mechanics that allow the player to trade one potion for a different potion before Fulfilling, etc. Hopefully I'm not overlooking anything obvious.)
Thanks for your hard work on this great implementation, and for considering this request! • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
Right now, when a player reaches the Fulfill action, if they cannot fulfill any Visitor's order (because they do not have the matching potions for any available Visitor), the game waits until the player clicks "Ignore" before moving on to the next player/round.
It would be really handy if the game could detect this situation (by comparing the player's potions vs. the available visitors) and automatically move past the Fulfill action in this case. It's a small thing, but (especially in turn-based games) it would save everyone from having to wait until a player logs in just to click "Ignore."
(I think that it's possible to determine this, because there aren't any mechanics that allow the player to trade one potion for a different potion before Fulfilling, etc. Hopefully I'm not overlooking anything obvious.)
Thanks for your hard work on this great implementation, and for considering this request! • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)
Right now, when a player reaches the Fulfill action, if they cannot fulfill any Visitor's order (because they do not have the matching potions for any available Visitor), the game waits until the player clicks "Ignore" before moving on to the next player/round.
It would be really handy if the game could detect this situation (by comparing the player's potions vs. the available visitors) and automatically move past the Fulfill action in this case. It's a small thing, but (especially in turn-based games) it would save everyone from having to wait until a player logs in just to click "Ignore."
(I think that it's possible to determine this, because there aren't any mechanics that allow the player to trade one potion for a different potion before Fulfilling, etc. Hopefully I'm not overlooking anything obvious.)
Thanks for your hard work on this great implementation, and for considering this request! • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA
Right now, when a player reaches the Fulfill action, if they cannot fulfill any Visitor's order (because they do not have the matching potions for any available Visitor), the game waits until the player clicks "Ignore" before moving on to the next player/round.
It would be really handy if the game could detect this situation (by comparing the player's potions vs. the available visitors) and automatically move past the Fulfill action in this case. It's a small thing, but (especially in turn-based games) it would save everyone from having to wait until a player logs in just to click "Ignore."
(I think that it's possible to determine this, because there aren't any mechanics that allow the player to trade one potion for a different potion before Fulfilling, etc. Hopefully I'm not overlooking anything obvious.)
Thanks for your hard work on this great implementation, and for considering this request! -
• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?
Right now, when a player reaches the Fulfill action, if they cannot fulfill any Visitor's order (because they do not have the matching potions for any available Visitor), the game waits until the player clicks "Ignore" before moving on to the next player/round.
It would be really handy if the game could detect this situation (by comparing the player's potions vs. the available visitors) and automatically move past the Fulfill action in this case. It's a small thing, but (especially in turn-based games) it would save everyone from having to wait until a player logs in just to click "Ignore."
(I think that it's possible to determine this, because there aren't any mechanics that allow the player to trade one potion for a different potion before Fulfilling, etc. Hopefully I'm not overlooking anything obvious.)
Thanks for your hard work on this great implementation, and for considering this request! -
• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?
-
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v135
-
• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?
Right now, when a player reaches the Fulfill action, if they cannot fulfill any Visitor's order (because they do not have the matching potions for any available Visitor), the game waits until the player clicks "Ignore" before moving on to the next player/round.
It would be really handy if the game could detect this situation (by comparing the player's potions vs. the available visitors) and automatically move past the Fulfill action in this case. It's a small thing, but (especially in turn-based games) it would save everyone from having to wait until a player logs in just to click "Ignore."
(I think that it's possible to determine this, because there aren't any mechanics that allow the player to trade one potion for a different potion before Fulfilling, etc. Hopefully I'm not overlooking anything obvious.)
Thanks for your hard work on this great implementation, and for considering this request! -
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Right now, when a player reaches the Fulfill action, if they cannot fulfill any Visitor's order (because they do not have the matching potions for any available Visitor), the game waits until the player clicks "Ignore" before moving on to the next player/round.
It would be really handy if the game could detect this situation (by comparing the player's potions vs. the available visitors) and automatically move past the Fulfill action in this case. It's a small thing, but (especially in turn-based games) it would save everyone from having to wait until a player logs in just to click "Ignore."
(I think that it's possible to determine this, because there aren't any mechanics that allow the player to trade one potion for a different potion before Fulfilling, etc. Hopefully I'm not overlooking anything obvious.)
Thanks for your hard work on this great implementation, and for considering this request! • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
Right now, when a player reaches the Fulfill action, if they cannot fulfill any Visitor's order (because they do not have the matching potions for any available Visitor), the game waits until the player clicks "Ignore" before moving on to the next player/round.
It would be really handy if the game could detect this situation (by comparing the player's potions vs. the available visitors) and automatically move past the Fulfill action in this case. It's a small thing, but (especially in turn-based games) it would save everyone from having to wait until a player logs in just to click "Ignore."
(I think that it's possible to determine this, because there aren't any mechanics that allow the player to trade one potion for a different potion before Fulfilling, etc. Hopefully I'm not overlooking anything obvious.)
Thanks for your hard work on this great implementation, and for considering this request! • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v135
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
Right now, when a player reaches the Fulfill action, if they cannot fulfill any Visitor's order (because they do not have the matching potions for any available Visitor), the game waits until the player clicks "Ignore" before moving on to the next player/round.
It would be really handy if the game could detect this situation (by comparing the player's potions vs. the available visitors) and automatically move past the Fulfill action in this case. It's a small thing, but (especially in turn-based games) it would save everyone from having to wait until a player logs in just to click "Ignore."
(I think that it's possible to determine this, because there aren't any mechanics that allow the player to trade one potion for a different potion before Fulfilling, etc. Hopefully I'm not overlooking anything obvious.)
Thanks for your hard work on this great implementation, and for considering this request! • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Google Chrome v135
Гісторыя справаздачы
Дадайце да гэтага дакладу
- Іншая Табліца ID / ID ходу
- Ці F5 вырашыла Вашу праблему?
- Ці з'яўлялася праблема некалькі разоў? Кожны раз? Выпадкова?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
