• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?