#170970: "Battle victory track advanced too much/incorrectly (I think!)"
Пра што гэтая справаздача?
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Калі ласка, праверце, ці існуе ўжо справаздача на тую ж тэму
Калі гэта так, ПРАГАЛАСУЙЦЕ за гэтую справаздачу. Справаздачы з найбольшай колькасцю галасоў будуць разглядацца У ПЕРШУЮ ЧАРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Дэталёвае апісанне
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).
Battle track advanced by one extra point.
-
• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася
Halifax battle starting in move 819. British player starts at -2 (attacking fort w/o artillery). Advances to 4 via rolls rather than 3 due to extra (I believe) advancement on battle track after Canadian brigade elimination.
British sequence is:
* Move victory market 2 positions backward (fort attack w/o artillery)
* Flag roll with non-indian light (advance battle marker)
* 2x Highland Brigades roll then re-roll to square hit and flag - battle marker advances 2 positions for total 3)
* 2x Metropolitan Brigades roll square hit and B&T - battle marker advances 2x as one French brigade eliminated and another reduced but then advances one more for a total of 3 (this seems to be the error). The battle marker advances once after the roll, again after French brigade elimination, and again after French brigade reduced.
I believe the right outcome is the battle marker should have advanced a total of 5 from a -2 start, for a total of 3 points for French rather than the 4 points received. This did not affect the results of the battle given subsequent British rolls.
Thanks for your help - I hope this is not a waste of time but helps finding bugs! • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Safari v18.5
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
Battle track advanced by one extra point.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Safari v18.5
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
Battle track advanced by one extra point.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Safari v18.5
-
• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)
Battle track advanced by one extra point.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Safari v18.5
-
• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA
Battle track advanced by one extra point.
-
• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?
Halifax battle starting in move 819. British player starts at -2 (attacking fort w/o artillery). Advances to 4 via rolls rather than 3 due to extra (I believe) advancement on battle track after Canadian brigade elimination.
British sequence is:
* Move victory market 2 positions backward (fort attack w/o artillery)
* Flag roll with non-indian light (advance battle marker)
* 2x Highland Brigades roll then re-roll to square hit and flag - battle marker advances 2 positions for total 3)
* 2x Metropolitan Brigades roll square hit and B&T - battle marker advances 2x as one French brigade eliminated and another reduced but then advances one more for a total of 3 (this seems to be the error). The battle marker advances once after the roll, again after French brigade elimination, and again after French brigade reduced.
I believe the right outcome is the battle marker should have advanced a total of 5 from a -2 start, for a total of 3 points for French rather than the 4 points received. This did not affect the results of the battle given subsequent British rolls.
Thanks for your help - I hope this is not a waste of time but helps finding bugs! • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Safari v18.5
-
• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?
Battle track advanced by one extra point.
-
• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?
Halifax battle starting in move 819. British player starts at -2 (attacking fort w/o artillery). Advances to 4 via rolls rather than 3 due to extra (I believe) advancement on battle track after Canadian brigade elimination.
British sequence is:
* Move victory market 2 positions backward (fort attack w/o artillery)
* Flag roll with non-indian light (advance battle marker)
* 2x Highland Brigades roll then re-roll to square hit and flag - battle marker advances 2 positions for total 3)
* 2x Metropolitan Brigades roll square hit and B&T - battle marker advances 2x as one French brigade eliminated and another reduced but then advances one more for a total of 3 (this seems to be the error). The battle marker advances once after the roll, again after French brigade elimination, and again after French brigade reduced.
I believe the right outcome is the battle marker should have advanced a total of 5 from a -2 start, for a total of 3 points for French rather than the 4 points received. This did not affect the results of the battle given subsequent British rolls.
Thanks for your help - I hope this is not a waste of time but helps finding bugs! -
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Safari v18.5
-
• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?
Battle track advanced by one extra point.
-
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
Halifax battle starting in move 819. British player starts at -2 (attacking fort w/o artillery). Advances to 4 via rolls rather than 3 due to extra (I believe) advancement on battle track after Canadian brigade elimination.
British sequence is:
* Move victory market 2 positions backward (fort attack w/o artillery)
* Flag roll with non-indian light (advance battle marker)
* 2x Highland Brigades roll then re-roll to square hit and flag - battle marker advances 2 positions for total 3)
* 2x Metropolitan Brigades roll square hit and B&T - battle marker advances 2x as one French brigade eliminated and another reduced but then advances one more for a total of 3 (this seems to be the error). The battle marker advances once after the roll, again after French brigade elimination, and again after French brigade reduced.
I believe the right outcome is the battle marker should have advanced a total of 5 from a -2 start, for a total of 3 points for French rather than the 4 points received. This did not affect the results of the battle given subsequent British rolls.
Thanks for your help - I hope this is not a waste of time but helps finding bugs! • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Safari v18.5
-
• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Battle track advanced by one extra point.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Safari v18.5
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
Battle track advanced by one extra point.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Safari v18.5
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
Battle track advanced by one extra point.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Safari v18.5
Гісторыя справаздачы
Дадайце да гэтага дакладу
- Іншая Табліца ID / ID ходу
- Ці F5 вырашыла Вашу праблему?
- Ці з'яўлялася праблема некалькі разоў? Кожны раз? Выпадкова?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
