• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

Kind of. Here's the spanner in the works: when I replay, prior to the Pretorium play, it shows me with 8 coins, which are then decreased (correctly) to 1 at Move #64. So that's weird (and doesn't match the screenshot). Then, on the next move when I build something for free, my coin count goes up to 3 for no obvious reason. So that's also weird. (I don't think Urbanism should have fired in that case because there was no linking and no "free" condition, just a discount that applied, but if it *did* then it should have gone up by *4* not *2*. Or maybe it went up by 4 from -1 to get to 3? In which case the 1 was an incorrect display?) Basically, there's some hinky stuff going on but it's hard to diagnose without seeing the code. If I were sure the parenthetical above were a distinct bug I'd file a separate report for it, but it's too tightly tangled for me to do that.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

The rules say (p14) "If your opponent doesn't have enough coins, they lose all of their coins." There's no way to go negative in the in-person game because money is managed with physical coin tokens, so if you would otherwise go negative you should just go to zero.

Screenshot:
blahedo.org/bga/seven-duel-negative.png

This is Table № 137320811 at Move #64. I suspect the cause had to do with my opponent having the Strategy token, building Pretorium (a three-shield card), and being placed just right to pick up *both* military tokens on the same turn, possibly bypassing some check in the code or checking against the original instead of current number of coins or somesuch.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?