• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?