• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?