• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?