#85415: "prevent conceding victory around the end of the game"
Пра што гэтая справаздача?
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Калі ласка, праверце, ці існуе ўжо справаздача на тую ж тэму
Калі гэта так, ПРАГАЛАСУЙЦЕ за гэтую справаздачу. Справаздачы з найбольшай колькасцю галасоў будуць разглядацца У ПЕРШУЮ ЧАРГУ!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Дэталёвае апісанне
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. -
• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. -
• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. -
• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?
-
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. -
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
-
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :
- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL
My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO. • Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
Гісторыя справаздачы
But not understandable on BGA where the computer calculates and there's no effort from the player besides waiting 10 seconds.
So do you mean for this suggestion to apply ONLY to real time games?
That would make it a better suggestion, but it's not in the text of the suggestion.
Дадайце да гэтага дакладу
- Іншая Табліца ID / ID ходу
- Ці F5 вырашыла Вашу праблему?
- Ці з'яўлялася праблема некалькі разоў? Кожны раз? Выпадкова?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
