#94314: ""One or Two Dutch" and "Extra Roles" Variant Setups"

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5

• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5

• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на якім хаду?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5

• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5

• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5

• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5

• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5

• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5

Пра што гэтая справаздача?

Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя

Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя

Калі ласка, праверце, ці існуе ўжо справаздача на тую ж тэму

Дэталёвае апісанне

Гісторыя справаздачы

Дадайце да гэтага дакладу

Змяніць статус справаздачы на:

Дапамога

Дапамагаць

Сачыце за намі