#96639: "Have 2 arenas - 1 vs 1 for competitors, game recommended number of player for others"
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Што адбылося? Калі ласка, абярыце з ніжэй прапісаныя
Калі ласка, праверце, ці існуе ўжо справаздача на тую ж тэму
Калі гэта так, ПРАГАЛАСУЙЦЕ за гэтую справаздачу. Справаздачы з найбольшай колькасцю галасоў будуць разглядацца У ПЕРШУЮ ЧАРГУ!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Дэталёвае апісанне
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст памылкі, якую вы бачыце на экране (калі яна ёсць).
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• Калі ласка, растлумачце, што вы хацелі зрабіць, што вы зрабілі і што здарылася
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
• Што было намалявана на экране, калі вас заблакавала? (Пусты экран? Частка гульнявога стала? Паведамленне пра памылку?)
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
• Якая частка правілаў не выкананая ў версіі BGA
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• Ці відаць парушэнне правілаў у паўторы гульні? Калі так, то на яком хаду?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
• Якое гульнявое дзеянне вы хацелі зрабіць?
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• Што вы спрабавалі зрабіць, каб выканаць гэтае гульнявое дзеянне?
• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі зрабіць гэта (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
• На якім кроку гульні адбылася праблема (якая была інструкцыя ў той момант у гульні)?
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• Што адбылося, калі вы паспрабавалі здзейсніць гульнявое дзеянне (паведамленне пра памылку, паведамленне ў радку стану гульні ...)?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
• Калі ласка, апішыце памылку адлюстравання. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
• Калі ласка, скапіруйце тэкст на англійскай замест перакладу на ваш мову. Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• Дзе можна знайсьці гэты тэкст у сістэме перакладу? Калі так, ці быў ён перакладзены больш за 24 гадзін таму?
• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
• Калі ласка, дакладна і коратка апішыце сваю прапанову, каб зрабіць яе найбольш даступнай для разумення.
Hello,
There is a trend for many games to converge with 1 vs 1 games, even when it is not the recommended settings for that game.
There are many reasons for that : people want game to move fast, they want the settings to be simple to avoid chance (bad starting position) "spoiling" their performance, and so on.
Since the players playing that way tend to have more games played than others, they tend to become gurus and impose this format to many arena settings.
But there are many other players that would rather play on the recommanded settings, in a competitive way as well, but with more variability. I see there are complaints and arguing in many game dedicated threads.
I suggest to have 2 arenas (or two leagues, or whatever), one for the 1 vs 1 players, one for the game recommended settings player.• Якім браўзэрам вы карыстаецеся?
Mozilla v5
Гісторыя справаздачы
Дадайце да гэтага дакладу
- Іншая Табліца ID / ID ходу
- Ці F5 вырашыла Вашу праблему?
- Ці з'яўлялася праблема некалькі разоў? Кожны раз? Выпадкова?
- Калі ў вас ёсць скрыншот гэтай памылкі (добрая звычка), вы можаце скарыстацца Imgur.com, каб загрузіць яго і ўставіць сюды спасылку.